![]() Vance (2017) goes further in describing urban society as ‘Gesellschaft’-a society based on indirect social interactions and impersonal institutions. It is likely urban approaches to social work are based on segmented models and rely on the availability of other services existing in the area, services that may not exist in rural areas. urban program and service design is often unsuitable for rural areas and may not be relevant. Mason (2006) refers to this as urbocentrism-seeing the city and urban environment as the norm. The ultimate aim of practice is to bring the rural personal into the centre of a usually urbocentric policy domain. Global practice highlights how globalisation, in particular, affects rural communities.Įcological systems theory emphasises the fit or lack of fit between an individual and her or his environment and seeks to change systems or adapt to them in an appropriate manner to produce better outcomes for rural people/communities. the oppression of women by men.įeminist approaches aim to create structural change as a result of the oppression of women within male dominated power structures. Oppression is based on unequal power across social categories, e.g. It aims to be person-centred, identifies the structural issues associated with individual disadvantage, works for the necessary radical social changes and is based on equality in the helping profession. The human rights approach allows clients and others to see that the human rights of citizens in rural and remote areas are being abused because they do not have the same access to services, health outcomes, education, employment and other opportunities enjoyed by most Australians.Īnti-oppressive practice is highly relevant in the rural situation. A worker’s role is not only to empower people to a greater understanding of their disadvantage (‘conscientisation’) but also to advocate for the resources needed to empower people to make positive changes in their lives. ![]() Structural framework-how limited service infrastructure shapes rural disadvantage and quality of life. Alston and Kent (2004) attribute this to the neoliberal policy response to globalisation involving regionalisation (centralising services in regional cities), rationalisation (allocating services based on supply and demand principles), centralisation (pulling service administration back to the capital cities) and privatisation (tendering out services previously provided by government). Mason (2006) suggests this increase in people’s needs is linked to the decline in agricultural-based industries and the impact of globalisation on farmers continuing drought the prevalence of violence in rural communities cuts to rural public service provision the failure of regional development policy and the impact of economic restructuring limited educational opportunities and the impact on rural communities of the introduction of competition policy and tendering. Risks of social exclusion for some groups of rural inhabitants. Changes in the labour force and in the structure of the population (e.g.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |